Ah, ok.
I'm all for it...
Did you decide anything on #2? (the schema validation default to false
item)
---
Corbett J. Klempay
Trilogy
512.874.5176 (W) | 512.750.1372 (C)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edwin Goei
<edwingo@sun. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Xerces1,2 proposals: one w/
potential incompatible
11/08/2001 change
06:43 PM
Please
respond to
xerces-j-user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As for #1: has anyone heard when the SAX2r2 will be out? Are there bugs
in
> the stock SAX 2.0 that are bugging people that would warrant the bundling
> of a beta/release candidate (admittedly, I'd bet pre2 SAX code is likely
>
> = the 2.0 code in robustness) SAX release?
The update I am proposing would sync Xerces 1 & 2 with the latest bugfix
release of SAX 2.0. The original SAX 2.0 release had bugs in it that
are now fixed in SAX2-r2pre2.
-Edwin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
