> This brings up a related issue.  It seems that there were a few minor
> method signature changes made between SAX2.0 final and subsequent sax2
> bugfix releases. 

Actually I think that all of those were in the "SAX2 r2pre1" release of
last December.  So far as I know, no more signature changes should
be there.  (That assumes those "signature tests" don't care about the
RuntimeException subclasses -- any method can throw those, whether
or not they're explicitly declared, so it'd be pointelss to consider them.)


> Here are the signature diffs that were found:
>   + 3 SAXException-s had public no-arg constructors added
>   + DefaultHandler.resolveEntity() added a throws IOException
> 
> Not sure what SAX should do with this info b/c these can probably be
> considered SAX spec bugs. 

That's certainly my stance.  In fact, that's a top goal of SAX2 r2:
resolving the open spec issues/bugs.

- Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to