Edwin Goei wrote: > Did you all consider other schema languages? What if someone wanted to > use RelaxNG, for example? Not sure what the solution should be, > though. The downside to deriving another class is complexity.
That's the whole point of the parser configuration framework so that people can do this exact thing (and more). Then you simply instantiate an appropriate API generator (DOMParser or SAXParser) with the new configuration. Which leads me to think that maybe we should have a META-INF service description for which parser configuration the JAXP implementation instantiates. Then people could use Xerces2 *and* substitute their configuration automatically by adding an appropriate Jar file w/ service description *before* the Xerces2 jar file. Thoughts? -- Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
