Edwin Goei wrote: > FactoryFinder class is duplicated already in javax.xml.parsers and > javax..transform b/c we don't want it to be exposed as part of JAXP. It
I would not suggest making it part of JAXP. It's just a generic way of dynamically instantiating a class that works both in Java 1.1 and Java 2. But I thought the whole purpose of xml-commons was to reduce the duplication of code. So that's why I proposed to put it somewhere in xml-commons. > This will allow anyone else who wants to implement JAXP to take the code > from xml-commons and not depend on code in Xerces2. I guess an Seems reasonable. > alternative would be to move the ObjectFactory code into xml-commons, > but that has other disadvantages. I agree. So what do people think is the lesser of two evils? -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
