Elena Litani wrote: > I propose we rename startEntity() and endEntity() to startEntityRef() > and endEntityRef().
The real question is how much do we want to deviate from SAX. We originally designed XNI to be as close in naming to SAX as possible so that it would be familiar for XML programmers to move to XNI. However, we've already deviated in regards to method parameters, etc. So, what do people think? Should we go further to "clean up" the XNI API? -- Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
