>Is the pull parsing in Xerces validating also? If so I think it would make
>Xerces the first validating pull parsing parser available :)
Xerces incremental parsing can validate, depending on how you configure the parser. That's been true for quite some time...
Whether you call it a "pull parser" may be open to debate; it's an incremental SAX (or XNI) parser, which some folks consider a slightly different beast. (That crew would insist that a true pull parser would have to return nodes one at a time directly to the routine which requested them, rather than delivering bursts of nodes through an event stream. Capabilities are similar, but the programming approach is a bit different.)
______________________________________
Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
- Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Daniel Shane
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Glenn Marcy
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Daniel Shane
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Andy Clark
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Joseph Kesselman
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Daniel Shane
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Joseph Kesselman
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Joseph Kesselman
- Re: Xerces: Incremental parsing, can it be done? Alan Colette
