Hi all,
 
My problem might be a feature of Xerces, or a feature of XML schema - I am not sure.
In any case, I think this feature is wrong.
 
In a schema like this:
 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="
http://schemas.devxpert.com/order"
                    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
                    xmlns:my="my_imported_namespace"
                    xmlns:dx="http://schemas.devxpert.com/order"
                    elementFormDefault="qualified">
     <xsd:import namespace="my_imported_namespace" schemaLocation="import.xsd"/>
...
</xsd:schema>
 
When the parser parses the xml:import, it takes the schemaLocation and assumes it is a file on the file system !
 
Now this approach is quite reasonable when you work with small systems, but not on large scale.
In the system I'm currently developing, we don't keep the schemas in file system at all !
We keep XML schemas in the Database. There are many good reasons for this.
 
When we use a parser to parse an XML instance and validate it with a schema, we take the schema (and all its imported and included xsd files) directly from the Database. We don't want to write them to the file system and then tell the parser where they are located on the disk.
Xerces supports this behavior by using the InputSource class, which allows the input to come from a string, not from a file.
In addition, Xerces has the Entity Resolver, which allows me to supply the parser an Input Source for the entity "import.xsd".
 
But before calling my custom made entity resolver, Xerces tries to expand the value "import.xsd" to a meaningfull URI, and its last resort is to assume it's in the "user.dir" directory [System.getProperty("user.dir")].
 
So you see, Xerces assumes that "import.xsd" is a file. Why is that? Is it Xerces, or is it defined by the XML Schema Recomendation?
And in any case, could it be changed?
Isn't it much more general (and thus elegant) to allow for entities to come not only from file system?
 
    Evyatar.
 

Reply via email to