Hi Neil,

This bit me during the Hackathon as well.  I seem to recall that Ant has a
way of detecting whether a taskdef is present.  I think it would be worth it
to see if the xjavac task can be invoked only when its available.

Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: xjavac missing. commenting out right solution?


> Hi Troy,
>
> Commenting this out should work fine, so long as you're not compiling
under
> an IBM JDK1.4.x.  The root of the problem was that our tools generation
> code was a bit broken--more seriously than this, is also removed the
> LICENSE files for the jars included there...--and this only became evident
> after 2.2.1.
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
> Neil Graham
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> Phone:  905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
> E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> |         |           "Troy"           |
> |         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
> |         |                            |
> |         |           11/26/2002 07:53 |
> |         |           AM               |
> |         |           Please respond to|
> |         |           xerces-j-dev     |
> |         |                            |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   |
|
>   |       To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
>   |       cc:
|
>   |       Subject:  xjavac missing. commenting out right solution?
|
>   |
|
>   |
|
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> I just downloaded the xerces xerces-2_2_1 and built
> them on linux and j2sdk 1.4.1.
>
> The file tools/bin/xjavac.jar is missing, and I
> couldn't find where to get it, so I commented out
> the relevant portions in the build.xml file.
> This seemed to work.
>
> I was wondering if this is what was intended.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Troy
>
> Troy Korjuslommi                Tksoft Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to