DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4284>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4284 Java serialization problematic for broad trees ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-09 15:20 ------- In most cases, the best serialization for a DOM's content is indeed XML. But I agree that there are occasionally cases where the Java objects may worth serializing. It msy be massively inefficient, admittedly, but it may be better at least for prototyping purposes than trying to extract all the relationships to DOM nodes, save them as XPaths, and then re-bind them after re-parsing the XML. Question is whether our default DOM implementation should support Java object serialization or not. Especially in the case of the deferred DOM... If we can do it easily, we should probably do it. If it's hard, we may want to think long and hard about which implementations are and aren't serializable. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
