DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882 incorrect validation of restrictions of any ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-24 20:31 ------- I believe the spec makes it clear that a model group is not a particle in itself, but rather the term of a particle. [1] Model groups do not contain the occurance ranges that particles do. [2] When a <sequence>, <choice>, or <all> in a schema doc is read in by the parser, it is treated as a particle whose term is a model group with the corresponding compositor. [3] Thus, your inner sequence model group is the term of a particle, with max- and minOccurs of the particle set to 1. Since this particle belongs to the particles of the outer sequence model group, the inner sequence model group is considered "pointless". [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Particle_details [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Model_Group_details [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-contentModel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
