Re: [VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member of the "federation" of XML projects

[Joseph Kesselman]

> So even if this isn't the situation we'd hoped for, it's the one
> we have and its existed for long enough that I'm not persuaded it's
likely
> to change.  So I'd like to recognize it and codify it in our charter,

If it isn't what we want, what is the advantage of institutionalizing?

More generally: Ignoring the administrivia, what does breaking Xerces into
sub-projects actually buy us, versus our current practices?


(I don't have an opinion either way, yet. I'm waiting to hear a stronger
argument for restructuring.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]