Andy Clark wrote: > > I figured that thread was deep enough... ;) > > Ari wrote: > > Is there a reason both versions of DOMParser, as well as > > org.apache.xerces.xni.XMLDTDHandler don't use > > org.xml.sax.ext.DeclHandler? The methods seem to have the same masks... > > Simply put, SAX doesn't communicate enough information. Also, > we need a native pipeline architecture that allows editing of > the information stream. Again, SAX doesn't provide this > directly. (e.g. Attributes doesn't allow editing.) >
But it would appear that SAX is a subset of XNI. Why not include SAX compatibility? It looks like all that would be needed is adding a couple of implements... clauses. Ari. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
