Hi Don,
Andy Clark already responded to your question about getting the Xerces-1 code from CVS.
Regarding your question on the value of reporting bugs against Xerces-1, I'd say that it's definitely worthwhile, particularly if the bugs are very pressing matters for you. Xerces-2 doesn't yet support all of the major functions that version 1 of the Xerces-J parser did, and it will be some time before it catches up.
Thanks,
Henry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Zongaro XML Parsers development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab Tie Line 969-6044; Phone (905) 413-6044
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Xerces CVS Repository
Hi guys
Before reporting some bugs I checked out the latest Xerces code from CVS to
make sure the bugs were not already fixed. The files I was interested in
were in the org.apache.xerces.readers package, but the files have been
removed with the "Merge/move of Xerces 2 to the trunc! " log entries.
Where can I get the latest Xerces code if it is not available from the CVS
Repository ?
Is there any point logging bugs against Xerces, or should our efforts be
towards Xerces 2. ?
Any help to the above questions would be very much appreciated.
Regards
Don O'Leary
