Hi Torsten and Alek,
You're not being ignored--it was a long weekend up here in Canada, so I
haven't been on line to see these messages. Now I'm here, so I'll try and
answer:
The first problem you found--where an included schema would be flagged as
being in error for having a non-identical namespace even when it had an
identical target namespace--was fixed in CVS soon after 2.0.2 went out.
The other two I don't know about; if you could send a (preferably
trimmed-down) test case, I'll do the best I can to look into them. Sure
sounds like bugs though...
Hope that helps,
Neil
Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|--------+------------------------>
| | Torsten Curdt |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | > |
| | |
| | 07/02/2002 |
| | 06:22 AM |
| | Please respond|
| | to |
| | xerces-j-user |
| | |
|--------+------------------------>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: caching of grammars that include other grammars
|
|
|
|
|
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Monday 01 July 2002 22:38, Aleksandar Milanovic wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Few days ago I sent two emails about problems related to caching grammars
> (schemas) that include other grammars. Isn't there anybody competent to
> answer these questions?
Same here... we must have been just ignored... :-/
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
