Joseph, Thank you for clarification. Maybe anyone can share some numbers / guidelines fro personal experience on when use / do not use this option
Thanks, Pavel > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Kesselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Defer node expansion > > > On Wednesday, 11/20/2002 at 02:46 ZE2, Pavel Ausianik > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could somebody explain when the defer node expansion should > be used in > > xerces 2? > > 1) When you don't intend to examine the entire document, this > choice can > save memory and parsing time. > > 2) When latency (time before you can access the first node) is more > important than throughput (time before you can access the > last node), this > choice can make your program more responsive. > > Hence, deferred node expansion tends to be particularly helpful when > processing only part of a large document. But it may cost > performance when > processing all of a small document. That's why it's optional. > > > (Note the similarity to Xalan's "incremental DTM" mode.) > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
