Leonardo Palozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/14/2005 07:37:32 PM:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:30:53 -0500, Michael Glavassevich > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This looks very much like a bug [1] that was recently fixed in CVS. You > > Thanks Michael, I tried the latest gump and the bug has indeed been fixed. > > Is there any assurance you can give me in terms of the gump's stability? The GUMP process extracts the latest Xerces code from CVS every night and builds it. It does the same with the rest of the Apache projects (as well as others not from Apache). Though this helps flag compilation issues and integration problems between projects, it's not an indicator of stability. The GUMP builds are good for verifying bug fixes and also if you want to stay on the bleeding edge of Xerces development. > Is there an ETA on the next minor release? We're currently working on Xerces 2.7.0. This will be the next major release (there's no target release date yet). There currently are no plans for a minor release. > Thanks. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
