Hey all, LET YOUR VOICES BE HEARD!!!
I think the current version numbering scheme is confusing. Originally, Xerces-C used only: MAJOR.MINOR => 1.5 And so I was free to do all I wanted with subversions. It was clear that XML-Xerces 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, etc all belonged to Xerces-C 1.5. But then the Xerces-C folks started using subversion numbers: MAJOR.MINOR.SUBVERSION => 1.5.1 Now It's impossible to tell what version of XML-Xerces goes with what version of Xerces-C. I think that the only way to clear this up is for XML-Xerces to begin using sub-subversion numbers. I have two ideas: * use straight monotonically increasing numbering: 1.5.1-1, 1.5.1-2, 1.5.1-3, etc * use dates in YYYYMMDD format 1.5.1-20010915, 1.5.1-20011012, 1.5.1-20011121, etc Also, I prefer that dash to separate the Xerces-C version from the XML-Xerces version. LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK! Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
