<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yep, that did the trick. I'm sorry I missed that FAQ info.
No sweat - you've certainly gone far and beyond the effort of a mere mortal - I just like to get these things into the search engines so the next person that comes along can find it easier. > BTW, there's a minor (I think) bug in t/actualCast.t that causes it to > fail under test_harness. It appears that this test runs only 9 > subtests (of which 7 pass and the rest are skipped) but the script > declares 11 as planned, so test_harness declares the overall test as > failed. Yup, thanks. It's already fixed for the next release, but I haven't takent the time to actually produce a 2.5 release... Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
