On Saturday 12 January 2008 00:05:38 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > On 11/01/2008, Sebastian Trüg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just my 2 cents: > > Soprano has a IMOH very good DBus API [1] for RDF storage which fulfills > > all 3 of your requirements below. We already use it for Nepomuk and it > > works great. And since Xesam is already using URIs to identify stuff why > > not go the extra mile to RDF storage altogether? > > I thought Soprano depended on Qt?
That has nothing to do with the D-Bus interface. I thought we were looking for an API? > Anyways, I don't think the RDF quadruples is a good thing to expose > directly to the programmers who just want a quick and dirty metadata > storage. It is simply just too technical. That does not mean that we > cannot use that stuff under the hood though. > > > Timestamps are handled via named graphs [2], also known as context (RDF > > quadruples). > > Are you suggesting putting the mtime in the name of each RDF triple? > If we are to support timestamps I don't think we should expose them as > RDF quadruples because I still think that it is too much abstraction > to present to the end user developer. No, named graphs mean that each triple becomes a quadruple and the forth node is used to group triples together into subgraphs. These subgraphs are then annotated with arbitrary information such as creation date. Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
