2008/6/29 Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >> I think we have agreement on this. I have put it on the list of >> pending changes for the next release (be that 1.0 or RC3): >> http://xesam.org/main/XesamUpdates >> >> So if nobody starts complaining this one will go in. Speak now or >> forever hold your silence :-) > > One question -- shouldn't the sort.order field now be a list of > strings of the length of sort.fields? I think this makes things a > little uglier, but is probably necessary.
I've added this suggestion as the last bullet point in item 1 on http://xesam.org/main/XesamUpdates Please bring on the flames if you disagree. Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
