Hi Antoni On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Antoni Mylka <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ivan Frade pisze: > > 1) Release a tarball with the ontologies + HTML documentation so > > distributions can build packages from it, and tracker, strigi, > > kde-nepomuk depend on that package. > > For this we should use python/C and autotools. We have already a > > "soft validator" in C, plus a basic HTML generation also in C. > > > > This is the point we discuss on GCDS, and agree on the svn layout, use > > autotools and write the HTML generation. > > No problem as far as I'm concerned. Two questions though > - what was the agreed way to add examples/testcases to the 'ontologies' > folder. No, the idea is just to release the ontology files in a TRIG format in a well-known directory ($(PREFIX)/ontologies IIRC) + some HTML doc (so you can browse the ontology docs offline) No examples or test-cases for the ontology. There is no code: just the ontology definition. > > - do you intend to generate header files / vocabulary constants / > whatever is the c equivalent to a class similar to > http://tinyurl.com/nxfe5c, or leave that up to application developers? > No, the package only provide the ontologies. Each project decides what to do with them: tracker uses the ontologies to generate the DB schema, other projects have a generic triplet store and use the ontology in their own way... The same applies to libraries: it is not clear how to expose SparQL in a programatic way, so each library can decide how to generate its own API. > > > I couldn't check the wiki page, but i guess antoni wrote down what is > > his validator checking so i can cross-check what is missing in the C > > version. > > Is there something wrong with the trac wiki? For some reason i cannot access to the links published in the mailing list (it asks for password). I can access going to the project web page and accessing trac from there. > > What is blocking me now to write a proper HTML generator is to decide > > what language to use. I can complete the C code, or rewrite the things > > in python (nicer HTML template engines, easier string handling...). > > Python looks nicer but i am not sure there is a turtle parser... > > By all means I'm for python/ruby (actually ruby more, but python will > not be much of a problem either). All of them have redland bindings, and > raptor does claim to support turtle. I never used ruby but i feel comfortable in python. I need to check the redland bindings. regards, Ivan
_______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
