Leo Sauermann wrote:
> ok, summary from my side:
>
> * patches are a welcome idea by Antoni, Sebastian, Evgeny, Roberto,
> but some say: not mandatory.
>
> * maintainer has to reply to a patch within a week.
> agreed?
> (if all say yes, we work like this from now on)
>
>
> I would also say:
> patches do not have to be perfect, something like this is enough:
>
> "change nco:
> add:
> nco:PersonContact rdfs:subClassOf banana:Bananas.
> nco:Contact rdfs:comment "All persons are bananas in their brains."
> "
>
> We have an ontology language (RDFS, NRL and N3) for a reason: it gives
> us a clear langauge to speak.
> Such text is easy to write, but much more precise than prose.
>
> all ok?
fine by me. :)
_______________________________________________
Xesam mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
