Actually it sort of is. I took BSD (the license you refer to) and tried to adjust it to ontologies. Probably not the best idea. Anyway, the source is the same and my other email contains the updated license header based on the decision we apparently took a few months ago.
Cheers, Sebastian Ivan Frade wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Leo Sauermann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > License: > Ontology files are both prosa (=text) and software. > Years ago we thought it would therefore be wise to double-license > ontologies as CC-BY and BSD. > this is also the license that was since many months here: > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/wiki/License > why didn't you copy it from there? - any reasons to ignore the wiki > page or weren't you aware of it? > > > That is not the license stated in the Nepomuk official web page: > > http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nfo/LICENSE.txt > > I am confused. > > Regards, > > Ivan > _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
