On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:11:41PM -0300, George N. White III wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Khaled Hosny <khaledho...@eglug.org> wrote: > > > You can now grap the four styles from git tree: > > http://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math > > > > No proper release yet, but if no serious bugs appeared in the next 24 > > hours, I'll make one. > > > > For text use "XITS", and "XITS Math" for math. > > Thanks for producing the other .otf files. ATM I'm using linux, which > is "case-sensitive" and expects XITS-XXX.otf files (e.g., capitalized > xits).
I'm not sure what you mean here, if you are loading fonts by file name, then type it all lower case, if you are loading it by font name then the actual name of the file doesn't matter. > I suggest using captitalized names for the release. As previously > reported, the x86_64-linux version of xetex dumps core, so I'm using > the i386-linux binaries from TL2010 pretest. > > I tried formatting the AMS-LaTeX sample file (testmath.tex --> > testmath-XITS.tex) > > \usepackage{unicode-math} > > \setmainfont[ > Extension=.otf, > UprightFont=*-regular, > ItalicFont=*-italic, > BoldFont=*-bold, > BoldItalicFont=*-bolditalic, > Numbers=OldStyle, > Mapping=tex-text > ]{XITS} Just: \setmainfont[Numbers=OldStyle,Mapping=tex-text]{XITS} Or better (for fontspec2): \setmainfont[Numbers=OldStyle,Ligatures=TeX]{XITS} > > % math font > \setmathfont{XITS Math} > > I replaced the accent macros with unicode glyphs, e.g. Möbius, Poincaré, etc. > One AMS text symbol (\S --> §) generated and undefined. I've a copy of that file that I used for testing while ago, there are still some withstanding issues, mainly XeTeX limitations (like extensible arrows), I'm waiting for proper LuaTeX support in unicode-math (that is why I did all my testing on ConTeXt). > cmsy is still being used somehow, somewhere: > > $ pdffonts testmath-XITS.pdf > name type emb sub uni object ID > ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- > OYKLDN+XITS-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 5 0 > XOKMER+LMMono12-Regular-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 7 0 > HIHYEO+XITS-Bold-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 9 0 > CDRMSV+CMSY10 Type 1C yes yes no 10 0 > DQLWEP+XITSMath-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 12 0 > NATEFX+LMMono10-Regular-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 14 0 > BTXNGD+XITS-Italic-Identity-H CID Type 0C yes yes yes 20 0 If you have FontForge, you can open the pdf file in it and see what CMSY10 glyphs are used, and report it to Will. > With TL2010 prerelease XITS seems to be at a stage where extensive testing > will be useful. I would suggest providing some guidance for new users in the > documentation and with example files in order to help people get off to a good > start: > > 1) existing documents may need editing to replace macros with unicode glyphs or use xunicode etc. > 2) recommended xetex, etc. versions, e.g, > > XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.1 (TeX Live 2010) A user guide is must for the non-bata release for sure, any one is welcomed to contribute one, too. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex