On Aug 29, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Ross Moore wrote: > Hi Herb, > > On 30/08/2010, at 6:57 AM, Herbert Schulz wrote: > >> >> On Aug 29, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Ross Moore wrote: >> >>> >>> Attached is the version of Xunicode.sty that I'm using. >>> Please compare it with what you have. >>> >>> <xunicode-096.sty> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Howdy, >> >> CTAN still has 0.91 released 2008 and that's what is in TL2010 pretest. Is >> this purely experimental or are you going to release it (possibly if/when >> any dependencies get updated too)? > > It should be the same as the one posted on this list > a couple of months ago, and copied to Robin Fairbairns: > > > Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Bug in \textipa from xunicode.sty > From: Ross Moore <ross.mo...@mq.edu.au> > Date: 18 June 2010 7:11:18 AM AEST > To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms > <xetex@tug.org> > Cc: Robin Fairbairns <robin.fairbai...@cl.cam.ac.uk> > > It's fine to be released generally, as the changes are all > additions and improvements, so should not cause any regressions. > > > Note that locally I have it named as xunicode-096.sty > but it should be released as xunicode.sty . > I use xunicode.sty as an alias to the latest version. > > >> >> Good Luck, >> >> Herb Schulz >> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com) > > > > Hope this helps, > > Ross
Howdy, Don't know if there is a problem or not. The date of the xunicode.sty (0.91) I see on CTAN is 2008/02/07 so certainly nothing from 2010/06/18 or thereabouts. Good Luck, Herb Schulz (herbs at wideopenwest dot com) -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
