On 9/24/2010 11:37 AM, Ujjwol Lamichhane wrote:
Maxwell, Sorry! quite out of topic, is that Saṃskṛtā Devanāgarī font a
ASCII hack font or Unicode based font ?
Now that you mention it, it might be--I didn't pay attention to the date
below. I think the Unicode Devanagari block is pretty old, but it might
not be that old.
Anyway, I found other (Unicode) Devanagari fonts, I was just hoping
there was a way to tell license restrictions from otfinfo (without
firing up Font Forge, as Mike "Pomax" Kamermans suggested--I'm lazy, if
a command line tool can give me a quick answer, I prefer it :-)).
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:09 PM, maxwell <maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
<mailto:maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu>> wrote:
I used XeLaTeX to create a PDF. One of the fonts (SD-TTSurekh)
didn't get
embedded. Presumably this is because its license doesn't allow
that. But
how can I tell whether a given font allows embedding without running it
through xetex? In particular, otfinfo doesn't seem to provide the info:
-----------
> otfinfo -i /groups/opt/share/fonts/Sanskrit/SDSR0NTT.TTF
Family: SD-TTSurekh
Subfamily: Normal
Full name: SD-TTSurekh Normal
PostScript name: SD-TTSurekh-Normal
Version: 1.0 Wed Nov 18 18:34:04 1998
Unique ID: Alts:SD-TTSurekh Normal
Copyright: ISFOC-SANSKRIT-DEVANAGARI-SUREKH-NORMAL. Copyright
(c) 1997-98, C-DAC, PUNE, INDIA.
-----------
--
Mike Maxwell
maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu
"A library is the best possible imitation, by human beings,
of a divine mind, where the whole universe is viewed and
understood at the same time... we have invented libraries
because we know that we do not have divine powers, but we
try to do our best to imitate them." --Umberto Eco
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
