But the real question remains: does the topic starter really produce a file with 65000 pages? Or is there some other error at play? The topic starter never mentioned how large his "large" tex file is....
Wilfred ________________________________ From: Martin Schröder <mar...@oneiros.de> To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms <xetex@tug.org> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 5:13 AM Subject: Re: [XeTeX] HELP! ** ERROR ** Page number 65536l too large! 2011/9/29 Jonathan Kew <jfkth...@googlemail.com>: > Clearly Knuth didn't think there was any need for such large numbers > of pages in a single file. See TeX error #913: * 28 December 1990 R913. Avoid range check when there are 65536 or more pages (Eberhard Mattes). > It's possible (though I haven't tried) that pdftex in PDF output > mode would be able to generate more pages, as this avoids the DVI > path altogether. pdfTeX and luaTeX shouldn't have any problems up to some millions of pages; PDF is limited to <8m pages (number of indirect objects) with 32 bit readers. Best Martin -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
