Zdenek Wagner wrote:
I admit that things could be done better than in nowadays TeX but its complete revamping seems to me as bad investment. I would rather think of an FO processor.
And I agree with Zdeněk : this discussion will be productive only if we focus on what can be accomplished (w.r.t. spaces) with few or no changes to XeTeX, not on how we might best deal with the whole (intellectually daunting) issue of optimally typesetting Unicode. ** Phil. -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
