On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:49:46PM -0700, C Y wrote: > > > >> XeTeX is not MIT but GPL. It uses a GPL library (poppler), so... > >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3304292&group_id=194926&atid=951385 > > > > That affects only the resulting binary, XeTeX code is still MIT licensed > > (unless pdfimage.cpp is *copying* code from poppler), AFAIK. > > Has anyone looked at what would be involved with using something like > libHaru instead of poppler, to avoid the issue? Would the XeTeX > project be interested in such a patch?
Poppler is used to read PDF files (for inclusion) not to write them. Regards, Khaled -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex