Dear Chandra, arXiv does not support XeTeX/XeLaTeX. Please export the source to the appropriate *.tex file format and submit that file. arXiv does not currently have any plans to support XeTeX/XeLaTeX. Please make the necessary changes and attempt to reprocess your submission at your convenience.
-- arXiv admin On Sat Sep 20 03:36:19 2014, chyav...@gmail.com wrote: > Could you try including this in your preamble: > > \usepackage{hyperref} > \hypersetup{pdfcreator=XeLaTeX with hyperref} > > and compile and see if the resulting PDF is sufficient for your > purposes. > > Section 3.7 at > > https://www.tug.org/applications/hyperref/manual.html > > explains these options in full. > > HTH > > Chandra > > On 20/09/14 12:38, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > > Dear XeTex, > > > > I think my original email was not so clear. ArXiv.org of course > > accepts papers generated using LaTeX, but they want to be given the > > source files (.tex files, etc) rather than a pdf file. However, they > > apparently sometimes make exceptions to this rule if the pdf file > was > > generated using XeTeX/XeLaTeX rather than LaTeX. That is, they *may* > > in at least some cases accept a pdf generated by XeLaTeX, but will > > *not* accept a pdf generated by LaTeX. > > > > Therefore, if it is not too much trouble, I would like the metadata > in > > my XeLaTeX/xdvipdfmx generated pdf file to clearly indicate that it > > was generated by XeLaTeX (*not* by LaTeX). Would any one have time > for > > this? > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > Dan > > > > ------------- please ignore the following ------------- > > Dear arXiv-moderation > > [arXiv #128343] > > [arXiv #128400] > > > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Greenhoe > <dgreen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear XeTeX, > >> > >> I have tried uploading a paper in pdf format that I typeset using > >> XeLaTeX to arXiv.org. However, it was later removed because it > >> "appeared to be PostScript/PDF generated from TeX source". I wrote > to > >> arXiv-moderation, strongly arguing my case for using XeLaTeX rather > >> than LaTeX. They responded saying "In order to approve such a > request > >> we'd have to have a PDF which includes it's XeTeX nature within the > >> pdf properties...". > >> > >> When I typeset my paper using xelatex.exe, an xdv file is generated > >> which contains this in the metadata: > >> \Creator(LaTeX with hyperref pacakge)\Author()\Producer(XeTeX > 0.99991) > >> Later I use xdvipdfmx.exe to generate a pdf file. It contains this > >> information in the metadata: > >> Creator: LaTeX with hyperref package > >> Producer: xdvipdfmx (20140317) > >> > >> So although the producer fields provides evidence that I am using > >> XeLaTeX, the creator field erroneously implies that I have typeset > >> using LaTeX. Hence, there will be a high probability that my paper > >> will either be removed by an automated server at arXiv.org or a > human > >> administrator. > >> > >> I realize that I could possibly hand edit the xdv file or use a > >> metadata editor to edit the pdf file. But I would rather not do > this. > >> I would rather work transparently, not surreptitiously changing the > >> metadata of files. > >> > >> Would it be possible that some qualified person could correct the > >> creator metadata output of XeLaTeX? I am currently using xelatex > from > >> TeXLive 2014 running on Windows. Here is the first line from the > log > >> file: > >> This is XeTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-0.99991 (TeX Live > 2014/W32TeX) > >> (preloaded format=xelatex 2014.9.20) 20 SEP 2014 07:16 > >> > >> Many thanks in advance, > >> Dan > >> > >> -----please ignore the following----- > >> Dear arXiv-moderation, > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > > > > ## Keyword: Dear arXiv ## -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex