On 2016-06-15 17:55, David Carlisle wrote:
But surely there are lots of people out there happily using xelatex
and hyperref without any problem, right?
yes but most will use no driver option or specify xetex which works,
the explicit dvipdfm option doesn't but I'm not sure when that
stopped.
We had previously been using the [xetex] option, but that has stopped
working as well--i.e. I just tried my file with
\usepackage[xetex]{hyperref}
and it fails with the same error msg as no parameter, or as with
[dvipdfmx].
this year we moved support to github and made some emergency
updates for luatex changes but as far as I can see nothing's changed
in the xetex code path for hyperref.
Right, an hour ago I did a diff between the 2015 and 2016 copies of
hyperref.sty, and came up with only a couple diffs, which looked
innocent to my inexperienced eye totally. But since then, at Herbert
Schultz's off-line suggestion, I did a "tlmgr --update", and now I get
quite a few other diffs (looks like some of them were to accommodate
Italian section names, but there are a few other diffs). The error msg
remains.
Why is this only showing up now?
No idea, can you send me the full log off list and I'll see if I can
debug
Will do, thanks!
Mike Maxwell
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
