2018-02-22 11:44 GMT+01:00 Philip Taylor (RHUoL) <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk>:
> > > Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > >> I think the conclusion is that I was going about the problem the wrong >> way---that there is no one-to-one mapping between the Devanagari ASCII >> font and unicode font. Rather, it is many-to-one. >> > Is the problem not, in fact, that there is not one "Devanagari ASCII font" > but rather many, for each of which there is potentially a different mapping > required ? > Yes, there are many fonts with non-unicode proprietary encodings. The web sites with such fonts offer downlowd of a Windows executable which installs these fonts into Windows, so I have never managed to view such pages on Linux. It is not difficult to define the mapping for TECkit if you know the encoding. > Philip Taylor > > > > Zdeněk Wagner > http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml > http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex