What is the status of this? I removed a possibly invalid check at the time and nobody complained about missing translations anymore.
Nick On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Pjotr Vertaalt <[email protected]> wrote: > OK.... Hopefully it'll be resolved, because otherwise Transifex is a cool > tool. > > In the meantime, maybe you could take a one-time emergency measure: a > manual push of *all* .po files from Transifex to Git? > Then at least we can be sure that all translation changes until today, are > in Git.... > > Regards, Pjotr. > > > 2014-02-25 9:13 GMT+01:00 Nick Schermer <[email protected]>: > > I will add some debugging to the script because I have no idea if >> Transifex misses the update or the script fails in some way to update >> the po file. I did some checks on the latter by comparing the old and >> new po files, but they all seem to pass fine. >> >> Nick >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > And I can confirm that recently translations from +90% to 100% for the >> > xfce4-clipmn (as one of many example recently translated) aren't pushed >> to >> > git for spanish. >> > and not forget the home spanish page actually have some miswritting >> that I >> > fixed months ago and for now remain not pushed. >> > >> > So why was the suitch from local transifex to the transifex official >> website >> > originally? >> > >> > >> > 2014-02-24 14:24 GMT-03:00 Masato Hashimoto < >> [email protected]>: >> > >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:11:43 +0100 >> >> Nick Schermer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Bit late but still, >> >> > >> >> > I've heard this a couple of times now, also with other languages. >> Were >> >> > the old and new po files both 100% complete? >> >> > >> >> <snip> >> >> >> >> Most of old translations (on Tx) are not completed. >> >> >> >> As for the orage, I submitted not completed to completed once, but >> after >> >> that, >> >> I found mistranslation so submitted again with corrected translation. >> >> At that time, the latter submission was 100% to 100%. >> >> Both of submission (not 100% to 100% and 100% to 100%) are not pushed >> to >> >> git. >> >> >> >> As for the rest, not completed to completed submission (IIRR). >> >> >> >> Recent ja transtations status are probably as follows: >> >> >> >> Package Submitted to Tx Pushed to Git? (at) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> parole Jan. 26 Yes (Jan. 26) >> >> weather-plugin Jan. 27 Yes (Jan. 27) >> >> orage Jan. 29 Not yet >> >> xfce4-panel Feb. 20 Yes (Feb. 20) >> >> indicator-plugin Feb. 20 Yes (Feb. 20) >> >> xfce4-appfinder Feb. 23 Not yet >> >> xfce4-settings Feb. 23 Yes (Feb. 23) >> >> clipman Feb. 24 (by Nick) Yes (Feb. 24) >> >> >> >> All's branches are master. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> -- >> >> HASHIMOTO, Masato >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Xfce-i18n mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Pablo Lezaeta >> > >> > * Use Cop for Backups, Join whit this Referal and reseive 5 GB extra. >> > * Use Copy para su almacenamiento en línea, Únase con esta Referencia y >> > obtenga 5GB extra iniciales. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Xfce-i18n mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Xfce-i18n mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-i18n mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n > >
_______________________________________________ Xfce-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n
