Am Sonntag, den 27.02.2011, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Marcus Moeller: > Hi Christoph. > > >> Now that Thunar supports a lot of network protocols and handles local > >> media quite will, I would like to ask if it's still necessary to include > >> Gigolo? > > > > I'd like to keep it in: Although you can mount devices with Thunar, > > Gigolo is more convenient. It allows you to store bookmarks and > > automount devices. Without the bookmarks you hardly know what to enter > > in Thunar's address bar. > > Thunar also supports bookmarks.
Sure, but before you can do this you need to know the URI. ;) Constructing gvfs-URIs is difficult when it comes to things like bluetooth etc. Regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
