On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 12:41:31 -0800 suvayu ali <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Brock Hudson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Personally SELinux drives me up the wall sometimes, yes its nice but > > even my own shell scripts occasionally have a problem with it. :( > > > > I think security issues are of the prime importance. If someone wants > not to use SELINUX, its their choice. But having something as > important as the desktop manager on the default spin that doesn't play > well with SELINUX is not a good option in my opinion. > > > I do realize it doesn't handle dual screen but doesn't LXDE itself > > come with a disclaimer that it isn't a powerful desktop with all the > > features that most others have, but rather a more conservative > > approach to the desktop? > > I think use of XFCE is rather common on mobile platforms like laptops > and netbooks. These are also the platforms which get used in a dual > display configuration rather often (presentations or work with > external monitors at work). FWIW, I use XFCE on my primary desktop and > workstation too and they are all dual screens. > Like I stated about SELinux it is nice and I appreciate and understand why its there and its importance and I am a very big proponent of security however I was simply stating it is occasionally an annoyance for me but its just the way it has to be. I do realize Xfce is a popular choice for mobile platforms, and I am not saying that it isn't important to include that feature, I was just stating that LXDM and the other components of LXDE have a disclaimer with them that they are NOT feature rich compared to other DEs. _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
