On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:39:53 +0200 Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We could leave everyhing as it is now then. It doesn't matter which > one you choose as long as you only have one installed. Why restrict people to only installing one? > > or you want them both installed in > > case one has a bug that prevents you from doing work? > > I doubt average users really have two different programs installed in > case one breaks. And if something breaks, you can easily install > another terminal. But you cannot just install another email client, > you need to configure it and if you are not using IMAP, you won't > have your mail available. So this is much more critical - but I doubt > that anybody has installed two mail clients for that unlikely case. Sure. I agree the case moves further away from reality in apps that are complex and need setup. But for example web browsers, people may need several installed to test how a site they are desiging looks in webkit, etc. > > Sounds like upstream might just rename Terminal to xfce4-terminal > > and be done with it. > > In that case we should rename the package and the binary, too. Absolutely. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
