Sergio wrote: > On 06/29/2012 11:34 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ok, fine. I made a mistake thinking that the selinux issues had to do > with the lightdm package. But I think it's the selinux-policy package > that has to be updated, right? correct. Now, it was pointed out to me that lightdm-1.3.x is tracking the lightdm unstable upstream branch, so I'm not so sure about making this one available for f17 or not. I'll have to think about it. --rex _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
