On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:11:32 +0200 Raphael Groner <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's exactly the point. By re-implementing such "features", not only > acpid gets a lot of redundancy, but also upower. And that means > unneeded bugs bugs bugs. Nice little approaches and related projects > are being killed with one single growing complex system component > [*]. SCNR I'm not sure I follow here... acpid isn't a solution really. > For a desktop distribution, power management should be kept > configurable for the individual user, no matter what desktop > environment she uses, with a nice settings dialog, just like > xfce4-power-manager does. XFPM uses DBus to call the power > functionalities and it doesn't matter what backend is there to > implement those power functions, e.g. consolekit/upower or (some part > of) systemd. Sure. I agree. We just need xfce4-power-manager to handle this... which needs code. ;) > IMHO There should be more love available for systemd support from the > general non-Gnome developers site. Also agreed. ;) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
