On 1/7/21 5:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:51 PM Mukundan Ragavan <[email protected]> wrote:



There is a problem in doing this. If we move to pulseaudio-daemon, we
lose our current volume mixer - pavucontrol (which, I am sure requires
pulseaudio and is not generic). Other DEs, as far as I know (i.e. GNOME,
MATE, and Cinnamon), have their own mixers. pulseaudio-plugin relies on
an external mixer.

I would prefer not to move to without a suitable replacement for
pavucontrol - if we can avoid it. Does pipewire provide a suitable
replacement for pavucontrol?

Does this make sense?


pavucontrol works fine with PipeWire. The libpulse library interacts
with the PipeWire-PulseAudio daemon just fine, and everything
basically works.




In that case, I can definitely change it.

I remember seeing something like this -

Problem: problem with installed package pulseaudio-module-x11-14.0-2.fc33.x86_64 - package pulseaudio-module-x11-14.0-2.fc33.x86_64 requires libpulsecore-14.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package pulseaudio-module-x11-14.0-2.fc33.x86_64 requires pulseaudio(x86-64) = 14.0-2.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed - package pulseaudio-module-x11-13.99.2-1.fc33.x86_64 requires libprotocol-native.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed


This is from my test VM but let me check again.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
xfce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to