[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-03 03:12 -------
Well, yes and no. I can come up with a patch that does this for the three
BSDs;
--- NetBSD.cf?rev=3.110 2003-04-03 07:41:52.071181000 +0100
+++ NetBSD.cf 2003-04-03 08:20:06.287264000 +0100
@@ -338,6 +338,23 @@
* Make & install Features
*/
#define HasBsdMake YES
+
+#ifndef HasParallelMake
+#if ((OSMajorVersion >= 1) && (OSMinorVersion >= 2))
+#define HasParallelMake YES
+#endif /* >= 1.2 */
+#endif /* !(defined(HasParallelMake)) */
+
+#if HasParallelMake
+#define MutexDirective .ORDER
+
+#ifndef ParallelMakeFlags
+#define ParallelMakeFlags -j 10 -B
+#endif
+
+#define TopParallelDefines ParallelMakeFlags
+#endif /* HasParallelMake */
+
#define CompressAllFonts YES
#define GzipFontCompression YES
#define DefaultUserPath
/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/pkg/bin:/usr/local/bin:$(BINDIR)
but that's still broken for me. E.g, it tries to build in x/lib/oldX, but
that fails because liboldX depends on libX11, which hadn't been built. This
is also true for a good few other libraries; I don't have the log file to
hand, unfortunately, to give a comprehensive list. (Mark Vojkovich already
mentioned this aspect of it on xfree86@, btw.)
The Right Thing would be to add all the missing dependencies, across the
tree; I'll look into doing that, but I won't have anything constructive for
about a week, if at all.
Oh, on reconsideration; we probably don't want ParallelMakeFlags to be
auto-defined, because that would the build parallel by default, which is
broken at the moment (never mind that -j 20 breaks through kern.maxproc real
quick for me :-) .
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
