Yes, I think that's the best way. In theory (according to Przemek) gtwvx can inherit from gtwvt and specify the extension separately.
I want to do it that way for gtwvw, but don't know when I will do it. regards, budyanto On 24 Apr 2008 at 15:25, Peter Rees wrote: > > There are updates required to gtwvt to restore the extended > functionality that was lost when the harbour gt's were merged with xharbour. > > Can I request that the standard gtwvt is NOT changed but that the > enhanced version be incorporated into /contrib/wvtgui as a complete > standalone gt - possibly even changing the name to gtwvx or something > similar. This will make it easier to maintain compatibility of standard > gt's with Harbour. > > Thanks > > Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
