I implement real hb_retc_buffer() that always free memory.
#undef hb_retc_buffer
HB_EXPORT void hb_retc_buffer( char * szText )
{
HB_TRACE(HB_TR_DEBUG, ("hb_retc_buffer(%s)", szText));
hb_itemPutCPtr( hb_stackReturnItem(), szText, strlen( szText ) );
}
hb_retcAdopt don't free memory in some cases,
I've the changed coded running without memory leaks now.
Ron Pinkas escribió:
> Miguel,
>
> hb_retcAdopt() can not be responsible for any memory leak, and there's
> no need to make any such change because hb_retc_buffer() is only a macro
> which in turn uses hb_retcAdopt() . IAE, it's very frustrating trying to
> understand your issue without a sample. Please post a sample so we can
> review.
>
> Ron
>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
>
>> I found that in some situations the use of
>>
>> hb_retcAdopt
>>
>> generate memory leaks
>>
>> I'm changing it with
>>
>> hb_retc_buffer
>>
>> in some places.
>>
>> Any consideration ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Miguel Angel Marchuet
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
>> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
>> just about anything Open Source.
>> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
>> _______________________________________________
>> xHarbour-developers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
>>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
