Hi, On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Ron Pinkas <ron.pin...@xharbour.com> wrote: > Phil, I do have a question about class ERROR() implementation. Do you know > why is it implemented as SIMULATED datas? The problem is that an Error > Object can't be processed by functions such as ValToPrg(), and I can't think > of any reason what it was implemented that way. Array access is just as > simple with true datas. Do you have any reason we should not correct it?
I think that 1) no C level API allowed to add datas at that moment. 2) using methods allows us to validate values assigned, e.g. check if they have needed type; in :genCode assignment we automatically set :description. Anyhow, I see the reason to use actual datas. I changed it, although leaving intact most assign methods. -- Ph. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
