Hello, Thanks for the pointer. So, I think it is wise to let xHarbour have its compiler native memory manager and dlmalloc remains optional.
Andi On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:48:05 +0200 Ella Stern <ella.st...@xharbour.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > This is a suggestion for further testing rather then an argument pro or con: > > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/eu/vclanguage/thread/1ee82f1d-0222-4a45-ad72-97162e80b3a6 > > > Ella > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Andi Jahja <andi.ja...@yahoo.co.id> wrote: > > > 2011-11-12 07:54 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja <xharbour/AT/telkom/net/id> > > * include/hbsetup.h > > ! native xHarbour definition for HB_FORCEINLINE > > > > * source/vm/fm.c > > ! using native HB_FORCEINLINE for dlmalloc routines > > > > /* Borrowed from Harbour */ > > > > > > NOTE: > > > > Anybody has objection if dlmalloc be used as default memory manager? The > > advantage is very obvious: speed improvement > > > > Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
