This is really already possible. I don't see any major issues here, we
just need to make it clear how to go about doing it. There's just no docs
right now.
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 05:43 AM, Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
Possibly another way to think about this is to split Xindice into two
modules,
core and standalone. The goal of core would be to supply a very high
quality
native xml database with very little baggage, that could be cleanly be
embedded
into servers such as Tomcat, Avalon, Cocoon or JBoss. The goal of
standalone
would be to be a light weight server that embedded the core to provide a
reasonable set of standalone services. This would allow the best of both.
- joel
Kurt Ward wrote:
Concerning keeping the server as a stand-alone, I would have to say
definitely a stand-alone server. Not only community/user base will be
much
smaller if it is not, but there are more ways to use the server in this
setup
than there are tied to something else (that might not be needed at all).
Kurt
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Kimbro Staken
XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
http://www.xmldatabases.org/
