I feel Avalon is overkill for what we need: configuration of components is only a minor issue in Xindice, and the current framework works fine IMHO...
James > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir R. Bossicard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 December 2002 14:20 > To: Xindice Dev > Subject: [2.0] slowly moving towards Avalon > > > I took a look at the (currently broken) webdav implementation and > noticed that the Avalon framework was used for some components. > > In the current Xindice code, several classes (configuration) could be > replaced with those of the Avalon framework and I am very > inclined to do > it. It will let us focusing on the core business. > > Since I don't have many experience with Avalon, I would > welcome feedback > and opinion. > > -Vladimir > > -- > Vladimir R. Bossicard > Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice > >
