Vladimir R. Bossicard wrote:
So now for the proposal: is it OK to you if I commit the Jetty support in CVS? We grow by 700KB, but we gain IMHO a hell of a lot in flexibility.
My opinion (since you asked for it...)
- no to commit Jetty into cvs (we don't have Tomcat in cvs, wo why having Jetty?)
We have done it in cocoon CVS, since it's just 700kb. For users that need to try the product, it's a lifesaver.
- yes to support Jetty and even require developers to install it and use it for testing Xindice (I'm writing a nightly test and if we can have something easier than Tomcat, it would be great)
An installation howto for Jetty would be IMO sufficient.
But a great news, definitively
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------