Corba is not a bad thing because it is very very faster than xml-rpc. Perhaps xindice should implement a layer protocol and can be compliant for API access via Corba, Soap, ... via a Driver layer ...
perhaps you can get some idea in xmlBlaster project : http://xmlBlaster.org/ This software can be accessed via many langage via many protocol. A new protocol just need to be implemented like a driver... I'm not expert, it's just a proposal ;o) Cyrille David Viner a �crit : > well.. on the project planning notes > http://www.xindice.org/papers/planning.html, point 2.1.2.1 says > "Convert to XML-RPC API" for release 1.1... so i suspect that you should > choose that one.dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Florin Tudor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: XMLRPC or CORBA? > > I am going to use Xindice as a backend DB for a J2EE web app in Java. > Which API do you think > is better to use in order to acces the DB ?- the XML-RPC API- the XMLBD > (CORBA-based?) > API The key factors are:- speed- easyness to write code- future support > of the API Are these > APIs both created by xml.apache.org team or by a third-party? Florin > Tudor Web Application > Developer / Consultant > Middleware & Programming Dept. > Integrator /SAP Romania > www.sap.ro, www.integrare.ro > -- ----------------------------------------- Cyrille Giquello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tel : 331/01 49 17 40 93 KTALAND Batiment 104 50 av. du president Wilson 93210 La Plaine Saint-Denis http://www.ktaland.com/ ----------------------------------------- Encryption | Duncan Campbell | DST | Blacklisted 411 | ECHELON | 2600 | PGP | Corsica | NSA
