Hi, thanks for your answer.
But XUpdate is also one of your database accessors and implemented in xindice :-) whats the difference? True, SiXDML is no task of the database. Maybe a sql like interface would push the popularity. And now a often asked question, I hope you didn't kill me :-). Are there any internal papers about xindice-core? I'm very interested to understand the internals. I looked at the code, but further papers can help to understand it more. Tobias > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vladimir R. Bossicard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2002 11:21 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: SiXDML standard component of xindice? > > > are there any efforts to made SiXDML to the access > > and manipulations > > language no. 1 or would this be a bad idea? > > From what I've seen, SiXDML for Xindice is just > another Database. Currently Xindice only "supports" > the xmlrpc and embed modes but it shouldn't be a > problem to allow other databases accessors to be > dynamically plugged into Xindice's DatabaseManager at > startup. > > So for your answer: no effort from the Xindice's team > but we will do our best to provide an easy > pluggability. > > -Vladimir > > ===== > Vladimir R. Bossicard > Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
