Henrik Vendelbo wrote:
Hmm, look like a hack, but if it does the job I can live with it. I don't
quite understand why the string I pass isn't valid XML, which Xindice should
store properly. Or are you merely saying that I can speed up the DOM parsing
using a CDATA element ?
Does this mean that Xindice will go via DOM even if you use SAX ?
And will the CDATA wrap be removed before storing it in the db ?
Henrik,
Honestly, I was in a hurray and perhaps don't understand your
predicament entirely. If you want to store XML as XML, as DOM,
then don't use CDATA sections. If you want to store XML as a
String, use a CDATA section. You'll lose the ability to do XPath
queries and anything else XML-ish, but you can store non-well-
formed markup, or any content that you don't care about in its
form as markup.
If this isn't helpful, then I'm probably barking up the wrong tree.
Murray
......................................................................
Murray Altheim http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/
Knowledge Media Institute
The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK .
Monkeys use thoughts to control robotic arm
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/10/13/MN2018.DTL
Bush uses media expertly to push apocalyptic view
http://truthout.org/docs_03/091403J.shtml
